N.D. Const. art. III, § 7 — Research

Review by Supreme Court. Text of the section: current and prior versions.

Every citing reference in the corpus: 2 court opinions and 0 Attorney General opinions.

Generated from the citation graph of the validated corpus. Treatment groupings (construing / citing / recital) are heuristic reading aids, not editorial judgments — read the opinion before relying on any signal.

• Hendrix, et al. v. Jaeger, 2022 ND 168 (2022, Tufte, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 6: “…acilitate and safeguard, but not to hamper, restrict, or impair these powers." Id. "All decisions of the secretary of state in the petition process are subject to review by the supreme court in the exercise 2 of original jurisdiction." N.D. Const. art. III, § 7; see also N.D. Const. art. III, § 6 (stating all decisions of the Secretary of State "in regard to any petition are subject to review by the supreme court"). We have mandatory original jurisdiction under N.D. Const. art…”

• Bjerke, et al. v. North Dakota Legislative Assembly, et al., 2026 ND 118 (2026, McEvers, J.)

The sidebar keeps a curated digest; this page is the complete record.