N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8 — Research

District Court Jurisdiction. Text of the section: current and prior versions.

Every citing reference in the corpus: 526 court opinions and 3 Attorney General opinions. Counts include the section's pre-1981 designation (§ 92 (from 1976-10-07)), era-gated by the renumbering crosswalk.

Generated from the citation graph of the validated corpus. Treatment groupings (construing / citing / recital) are heuristic reading aids, not editorial judgments — read the opinion before relying on any signal.

Topics are machine-generated groupings of the citing references — reading aids, not editorial judgments. Documents cited after the last classification pass appear in the lists below until the next pass.

• Pederson v. State, 2026 ND 1 (2026, Crothers, J.)
• Kath v. Prochnow, et al., 2024 ND 112 (2024, Crothers, J.)
• Trenton Indian Housing Authority v. Poitra, et al., 2022 ND 87 (2022, Jensen, J.)
• Lavallie v. Jay, et al., 2020 ND 147 (2020, VandeWalle, J.)
• Holkesvig v. VandeWalle, et al., 2016 ND 107 (2016, McEvers, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 9: “…Article VI, section 8, of the North Dakota Constitution provides, in part, "The district court shall have original jurisdiction of all causes, except as otherwise provided by law_" Section 27-05-06, N.D.C.C., governs the district court's pow…”
• City of Harwood, et al. v. The City of Reiles Acres,et al.(cross-ref w/20130309), 2015 ND 33 (2015, Sandstrom, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 11: “…Under N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8, a district court has original jurisdiction of all causes, except as otherwise provided by law. District courts have general jurisdiction conferred upon courts by the constitution and have jurisdiction under N.D.C.C. §…”
• Luger, et al. v. Luger, et al., 2009 ND 84 (2009, Sandstrom, J.)
• Braaten v. Deere and Co., et al. (CROSS REF. W/960058), 1997 ND 202 (1997, VandeWalle, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 20: “…We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion when it refused to apply equitable tolling and we affirm the Judgment. 1 . Both parties frame the issue in terms of the "authority" of the district court. Article VI, section 8 of the North Dakota Constitution grants the legislature the power to limit the jurisdiction of the district courts. N.D. Const, art. VI, § 8 (providing "[t]he district courtfe] shall have original jurisdiction of all ca…”
• United Accounts, Inc. v. Teladvantage, Inc., 1993 ND 67 (1993, Levine, J.)
• State ex rel. Rayl v. Hettinger County, 1991 ND 49 (1991, VandeWalle, J.) · quotes the provision
  • “…oney judgment [*100] for funds retained by Adams County which should have been paid to the State School fund.” Therefore, the State rationalizes, the district court has original jurisdiction pursuant to North Dakota Constitution Art. VI, § 8.3 3 Article VI, § 8 provides: “The district court shall have original jurisdiction of all causes, except as otherwise provided by law, and such appellate jurisdiction as may be provided by law or by rule of the supreme court. The district…”
• Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P.C., 1985 ND 40 (1985, Erickstad, J.) · quotes the provision
  • “…titution which requires that all courts be open to everyone;9 Article I, Section 22, of our State Constitution which requires all laws of a general nature to have a uniform operation;10 and Article IV, Section 103, which is now, after renumbering, Article VI, Section 8, which provides that the district court shall have original jurisdiction of all causes.11 In our view, none of these provisions are being violated. 9 "All courts shall be open, and every man for any injury done him in…”

• Associated General Contractors of North Dakota, et al. v. City of West Fargo, 2026 ND 129 (2026, Jensen, J.)
• Don's Garden Center, et al. v. The Garden District, et al., 2024 ND 25 (2024, Bahr, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 16: “…Article VI, § 8, of the North Dakota Constitution provides, "The district court shall have original jurisdiction of all causes[.]" Section 27-05-06, N.D.C.C., provides, "The district courts of this state have the general jurisdiction c…”
• Boutrous, et al. v. Transform Operating Stores, et al., 2023 ND 35 (2023, per curiam)
• Guardianship/Conservatorship of R.G., 2016 ND 96 (2016, Sandstrom, J.)
• Albrecht v. Albrecht, 2014 ND 221 (2014, Sandstrom, J.)
• Haugland v. City of Bismarck, 2012 ND 123 (2012, Sandstrom, J.)
• State v. Zahn (CONSOLIDATED W/20060046 & 20060047), 2007 ND 2 (2007, Kapsner, J.)
• Luna v. Luna, 1999 ND 79 (1999, Sandstrom, J.)
• Goodman Investment, Inc. v. Swanston Equipment Co., 1980 ND 148 (1980, VandeWalle, J.) · quotes the provision
  • “…t in county court of increased jurisdiction and a question of title is raised, the county court is divested of jurisdiction and the matter must be certified and transmitted to the district court of the county. Sec. 33-01-06, N.D.C.C.; Herzig v. Herzig, supra. Section 92 of the North Dakota Constitution provides that the district court shall have original jurisdiction of all causes except as otherwise provided by law. Prior to the adoption of the revised Judicial Article of our Constitu…”
• Schnell v. Schnell, 1977 ND 30 (1977, Vogel, J.)

• WSI v. Jones, et al., 2025 ND 74 (2025, Crothers, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 4: “…The district courts of this state have "such appellate jurisdiction as may be provided by law or by rule of the supreme court." N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8. Appeals of administrative decisions to the district court "'are statutory in nature and are not matters of original jurisdiction for the district courts but rather involve exercise of appellate jurisdiction of the dist…”
• Friends of the Rail Bridge, et al. v. N.D. Dep't of Water Resources, et al., 2024 ND 22 (2024, McEvers, J.)
• Altru Specialty Services, Inc. v. N.D. Dep't of Human Services, et al., 2017 ND 270 (2017, VandeWalle, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 8: “…Under N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8, the district court has original jurisdiction of all causes, except as otherwise provided by law, and has appellate jurisdiction as provided by law or rule of the supreme court. Appeals from decisions of an administrati…”
• Opp v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation (consolidated w/20160215), 2017 ND 101 (2017, McEvers, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 8: “…Under N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8, a district court has original jurisdiction of all causes and such appellate jurisdiction as may be provided by law or by rule of the supreme court. Appeals from administrative agency decisions to a district court invol…”
• Stephenson v. Hoeven, et al., 2007 ND 136 (2007, Maring, J.)
• Transystems Services v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau, 1996 ND 124 (1996, Maring, J.) · quotes the provision
  • “…trary to law. The Bureau and Schmoll dispute Transystems’ arguments and Schmoll moves to dismiss Transystems’ appeal, arguing that the district court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to hear Transystems’ appeal of the Bureau’s order. [1] Article VI, section 8, of the North Dakota Constitution grants district courts “original jurisdiction of all causes, except as otherwise provided by law, and such appellate jurisdiction as may be provided by law or by rule of the supreme cou…”
• Basin Elec. Power Co-Op. v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau, 1996 ND 1 (1996, VandeWalle, J.) · quotes the provision
  • “…Bureau, either in the county of residence of the claimant or the county wherein the injury was inflicted.” Boyko, 409 N.W.2d at 640. We also held that the appeal could not be entertained by a district court under its general jurisdiction. “Under Article VI, Section 8, of the North Dakota Constitution, the district court has original jurisdiction of all causes, ‘except as otherwise provided by law,’ and such ‘appellate jurisdiction as may be provided by law or by rule of the supreme…”
• Boyko v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 1987 ND 110 (1987, VandeWalle, J.) · quotes the provision
  • “…to benefits. By not proving jurisdiction, he necessarily suffers the consequences of his failure to remember where he was injured. [3] Nor is this a matter which can be entertained by a district court under its general jurisdiction. Under [*641] Article VI, Section 8, of the North Dakota Constitution, the district court has original jurisdiction of all causes, “except as otherwise provided by law,” and such “appellate jurisdiction as may be provided by law or by rule of the supreme…”

• State v. Evitt, 2024 ND 150 (2024, Crothers, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 5: “…sdiction to redress. Under the Constitution and laws of North Dakota, "the district courts have jurisdiction over all criminal offenses committed within their respective judicial districts." State v. Lee, 2010 ND 88, ¶ 13, 782 N.W.2d 626; N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8 (providing district courts with "original jurisdiction of all causes, except as otherwise provided by law"); N.D.C.C. § 27-05-06(1) (providing district courts with jurisdiction "within their respective judicial district…”
• State v. Todd, 2017 ND 278 (2017, per curiam)
• State v. Delorme, 2013 ND 123 (2013, Sandstrom, J.)
• State ex rel. Harris v. Lee, et al., 2010 ND 88 (2010, Sandstrom, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 13: “…39-06-42(1) applied within the Minot city limits and that the highway patrol officer had the authority to enforce the statute within the city limits, it necessarily follows that the district court had jurisdiction over the offense. Under N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8, the district court has "original jurisdiction of all causes, except as otherwise provided by law." Section 27-05-06(1), N.D.C.C., clarifies that district courts have "[c]ommon-law jurisdiction and authority within thei…”
• State v. Ferrie (Consolidated w/20070371), 2008 ND 170 (2008, Sandstrom, J.)
• State v. Norby, 2002 ND 71 (2002, Sandstrom, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 3: “…The district court had jurisdiction under N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8, and N.D.C.C. § 27-05-06(1). This Court has jurisdiction under N.D. Const. art. VI, § 6, and N.D.C.C. § 29-28-06. II…”
• Eaton v. State, 2001 ND 97 (2001, Sandstrom, J.)

• Schmidt, et al. v. City of Minot, et al., 2016 ND 175 (2016, Sandstrom, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 4: “…nder N.D.R.App.P. 4(a), and this Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a district court judgment under N.D. Const. art. VI, §§ 2 and 6, and N.D.C.C. § 28-27-01. A district court has appellate jurisdiction as provided by law under N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8, and under N.D.C.C. § 27-05-06(4), and the issues raised in this appeal involve the district court's jurisdiction to hear the residents' appeal. II…”
• City of Dickinson v. Etienne, 2015 ND 193 (2015, VandeWalle, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 6: “…ons by which it is created and can be acquired and exercised only in the manner prescribed.' " *Holbach v. City of Minot,* 2012 ND 117, ¶ 5, 817 N.W.2d 340 (quoting *City of Bismarck v. Walker,* 308 N.W.2d 359, 361 (N.D. 1981)). Under N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8, a district court has appellate jurisdiction "as may be provided by law or by rule of the supreme court." "There is no constitutional right to an appeal." *City of Williston v. Werkmeister,* 2015 ND 172, ¶ 4, 865 N.W.…”
• City of Williston v. Werkmeister, 2015 ND 172 (2015, VandeWalle, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 4: “…7 N.W.2d 340 (quoting *City of Bismarck v. Walker,* 308 N.W.2d 359, 361 (N.D. 1981)). The North Dakota Constitution provides that the district court has appellate jurisdiction "as may be provided by law or by rule of the supreme court." N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8. There is no constitutional right to an appeal. *City of Grand Forks v. Riemers,* 2008 ND 153, ¶ 5, 755 N.W.2d 99. The right to appeal is [*431] a statutory right and, if a right to appeal does not exist, this Cou…”
• Hector v. City of Fargo, 2014 ND 53 (2014, Sandstrom, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 4: “…A district court has original jurisdiction of causes, except as otherwise provided by law, and appellate jurisdiction as provided by law under N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8, and the issues in this appeal involve the scope of a district court's jurisdiction over special assessments under N.D.C.C. § 40-26-07. Hector's appeal from the judgment dismissing his action is timely under N.D.R.App.P…”
• Capital Electric Coop., Inc. v. City of Bismarck, et al. (cons w/20060270), 2007 ND 128 (2007, Sandstrom, J.)
• City of Fargo v. Komad, 2006 ND 177 (2006, VandeWalle, J.) · construes, quotes the provision
  • ¶ 10: “…nt of conviction to the district court is to be "in accordance with the North Dakota Rules of Criminal Procedure." There is no ambiguity in those words. Although ordinarily judicial procedure is for the judicial branch to determine, N.D. Const., Art. VI, § 3. Section 8 of the Constitution provides that the "district court shall have ... such appellate jurisdiction as may be provided by law or by rule of the supreme court." Thus the judicial and legislative branches share authority whe…”

• Hoff v. City of Burlington, 2025 ND 62 (2025, Bahr, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 24: “…ation, or to compel the admission of a party to the use and enjoyment of a right or office to which the party is entitled and from which the party is precluded unlawfully by such inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person. See also N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8 ("The district court shall have authority to issue such writs as are necessary to the proper exercise of its jurisdiction."). "A petitioner for a writ of mandamus must show a clear legal right to performance of the act…”
• Fargo Education Association v. Fargo Public School District, 2024 ND 201 (2024, Bahr, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 6: “…tation, or to compel the admission of a party to the use and enjoyment of a right or office to which the party is entitled and from which the party is precluded unlawfully by such inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person. See also N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8 ("The district court shall have authority to issue such writs as are necessary to the proper exercise of its jurisdiction.").…”
• Motisi v. Hebron Public School District, 2021 ND 229 (2021, McEvers, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 9: “…n, or to compel the admission of a party to the use and enjoyment of a right or office to which the party is entitled and from which the party is precluded unlawfully by such inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person. See also N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8 ("The district court shall have authority to issue such writs as are necessary to the proper exercise of its jurisdiction.").…”
• Dickinson Education Association v. Dickinson Public School District, 2014 ND 157 (2014, VandeWalle, J.) · quotes the provision
  • ¶ 8: “…tion, or to compel the admission of a party to the use and enjoyment of a right or office to which the party is entitled and from which the party is precluded unlawfully by such inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person. See also N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8 ("The district court shall have authority to issue such writs as are necessary to the proper exercise of its jurisdiction.").…”
• Runck v. State, 1993 ND 27 (1993, VandeWalle, J.) · quotes the provision
  • “…state court. See People v. McLemore, 411 Mich. 691, 311 N.W.2d 720 (1981), and cases collected therein.3 3 In North Dakota, a district court has “authority to issue such writs as are necessary to the proper exercise of its jurisdiction.” N.D.Const. Art. VI, § 8. The federal government is not bound to honor state court writs of habeas corpus ad prosequendum seeking prisoners in federal custody, but may consent, in its discretion, to do so on principles of comity, as it apparent…”
• State ex rel. Employees of the State Penitentiary, Director of Institutions v. Jensen, 1983 ND 27 (1983, VandeWalle, J.) · quotes the provision
  • “…ling those liens. No statute of the United States is applicable to the filing of the liens or to the injunction to prevent filing and therefore, in this instance, the law of the State in which the United States District Court is held must apply. Article VI, Section 8, of the North Dakota Constitution and Section 27–05–06 of the North Dakota Century Code provide for the jurisdiction of the State district courts.5 These provisions confer upon the State district courts the jurisdiction…”

• N.D. Att'y Gen.: N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 99-L-98 (1999)
• N.D. Att'y Gen.: N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 81-131 (1981)
• N.D. Att'y Gen.: N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. (July 24, 1979)

The section is cited in the standard jurisdictional recital (“The district court had jurisdiction under N.D. Const. art. VI, § 8 …”) without further discussion in these opinions, listed for completeness:

2010s (159): John Beckstrand (deceased) by and through his Personal Representative, Julie Beckstrand v. Justin Beckstrand, James Beckstrand (deceased) by and through his surviving spouse, Cynthia Beckstrand, 2017 ND 20; Solwey v. Solwey, 2016 ND 246; Kraft v. State, 2016 ND 250; State v. Mercier, 2016 ND 160; State v. Garnder, 2016 ND 161; State v. Asbach (cross-ref. w/20140471), 2016 ND 152; State v. Goodale, 2016 ND 35; Clark v. Farmers Union Mutual Ins., et al., 2015 ND 300; State v. Nelson (consolidated w/ 20150213), 2015 ND 301; State v. Chatman, 2015 ND 296; Weigel v. Weigel, 2015 ND 270; Capes v. Capes, 2015 ND 254; State v. Guttormson, 2015 ND 235; Grigg v. Grigg, 2015 ND 229; State v. Zacher, 2015 ND 208; Anderson v. WSI, 2015 ND 205; Johnson, et al. v. Shield, et al., 2015 ND 200; State v. Kardor, 2015 ND 196; The City of Moorhead v. Bridge Company, et al., 2015 ND 189; Schlittenhart v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation, 2015 ND 179; Fugere v. Fugere, 2015 ND 174; State v. Lang, 2015 ND 181; Mattern v. Frank J. Mattern Estate, 2015 ND 155; Estate of Bartelson (cross-ref. w/20110114 & 20130022), 2015 ND 147; Johnson, et al. v. Mid Dakota Clinic, P.C., 2015 ND 135; Williams v. Williams, 2015 ND 129; Adams v. Adams, 2015 ND 112; Howard v. State, 2015 ND 102; State v. Gonzalez (cross-ref. w/20110051), 2015 ND 106; Hall v. Malloy, et al., 2015 ND 94; State v. Dahl, 2015 ND 72; City of Napoleon v. Kuhn, 2015 ND 75; State v. Eckroth, 2015 ND 40; State of North Dakota v. Damon John White Bird, 2015 ND 41; State v. Kovalevich, 2015 ND 11; State v. Galvez, 2015 ND 14; Sorum v. Dalrymple, et al., 2014 ND 233; Deeth v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation, 2014 ND 232; George v. George, 2014 ND 222; McCarthy v. McCarthy, 2014 ND 234; Capps, et al. v. Weflen, et al. (cross-ref. w/20120184), 2014 ND 201; Northstar Founders, LLC v. Hayden Capital USA, LLC, et al., 2014 ND 200; Rasnic v. ConocoPhillips Co., et al., 2014 ND 181; Golden Eye Resources, LLC v. Ganske, et al., 2014 ND 179; Krueger v. Grand Forks County, 2014 ND 170; State v. Stewart, 2014 ND 165; State v. Yarbro, 2014 ND 164; Nieuwenhuis v. Nieuwenhuis, 2014 ND 145; Mairs v. Mairs, 2014 ND 132; Schlieve v. Schlieve, 2014 ND 107; Tharaldson Ethanol Plant I, LLC, et al. v. VEI Global, Inc., 2014 ND 94; Frith v. WSI, et al., 2014 ND 93; In re S.B., et al., 2014 ND 87; Finstad, et al. v. Gord, et al., 2014 ND 72; Regan v. Lervold, 2014 ND 56; Estate of Wicklund (cross-reference w/20110081), 2014 ND 64; Coppage v. State (cross reference w/20070304, 20110076, & 20120267), 2014 ND 42; Fossum v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation, 2014 ND 47; Interest of R.L.-P. (consolidated w/ 20130383-20130386 & 20130388), 2014 ND 28; Holkesvig v. Dakota Spas, 2014 ND 9; Gustafson, et al. v. Gustafson, et al., 2014 ND 8; Phillips v. State, 2014 ND 10; Conzemius v. Conzemius, 2014 ND 5; Reep, et al. v. State, et al. (consolidated w/20130111), 2013 ND 253; Dominguez v. State, 2013 ND 249; State v. Otto, 2013 ND 239; Van Sickle, et al. v. Hallmark & Assoc., Inc., et al., 2013 ND 218; State ex rel. City of Marion v. Alber, 2013 ND 189; Kukla v. Kukla, 2013 ND 192; Anderson v. Jenkins, 2013 ND 167; Estate of Cashmore (cross reference with 20090315), 2013 ND 150; State v. Nickel (consolidated w/20120418), 2013 ND 155; Schmitt v. MeritCare Health System, et al., 2013 ND 136; Johnson v. Mark, et al., 2013 ND 128; Swearingen v. State, 2013 ND 125; Wilson v. State (consolidated w/ 20120426-20120428), 2013 ND 124; State v. Keller, 2013 ND 122; SolarBee, Inc. v. Walker, et al., 2013 ND 110; Sall v. Sall (cross-reference w/ 20100360), 2013 ND 108; State v. Farrell, 2013 ND 55; Barrett, et al. v. Gilbertson, 2013 ND 35; Matter of J.G. (CONFIDENTIAL) (cross-ref. w/20100366), 2013 ND 26; Interest of J.M. (CONFIDENTIAL), 2013 ND 11; Matter of M.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-ref. w/20080082 & 20100058), 2012 ND 261; D.E. v. K.F., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL), 2012 ND 253; State v. Herzig, 2012 ND 247; Hamilton, et al., v. Woll, et al., 2012 ND 238; Walstad v. Walstad, 2012 ND 204; Kohanowski v. Burkhardt, 2012 ND 199; Nichols, et al. v. Goughnour, et al., 2012 ND 178; George v. Veeder, 2012 ND 186; Interest of A.W. (CONFIDENTIAL), 2012 ND 153; City of Lincoln v. Johnston, 2012 ND 139; State v. Bruce, 2012 ND 140; Matter of Rubey (cross-reference 20100292), 2012 ND 133; State v. Eide (consolidated w/20110264-20110269), 2012 ND 129; State v. Schmidt, 2012 ND 120; State v. Parizek, 2012 ND 103; Watts, et al. v. Magic 2 x 52 Management, Inc., et al., 2012 ND 99; Raymond J. German, Ltd. v. Brossart, 2012 ND 89; Tibert et al. v. Nodak Mutual, 2012 ND 81; M.M., et al. v. Fargo Public School Dist. #1, et al., 2012 ND 79; Schock v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation, 2012 ND 77; Gonzalez v. Witzke, 2012 ND 60; Benson, et al. v. SRT Communications, Inc., 2012 ND 58; Langowski v. Altendorf, 2012 ND 34; Interest of T.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross reference with 20120168), 2012 ND 38; American Family Insurance, et al. v. Waupaca Elevator Co., 2012 ND 13; State v. Hayes (consolidated w/20110099-20110101), 2012 ND 9; Jund, et al. v. Johnnie B's Bar & Grill, Inc., et al., 2011 ND 230; Beaudoin v. JB Mineral Services, 2011 ND 229; State v. Nakvinda, 2011 ND 217; Alerus Financial v. Marcil Group, et al., 2011 ND 205; Simons v. State, 2011 ND 190; Matter of Rubey, 2011 ND 165; State ex rel. Schlect v. Wolff (Cross-reference with 20100034), 2011 ND 164; State v. Starke (Consolidated w/20100327), 2011 ND 147; Glass v. Glass, 2011 ND 145; Krueger v. Krueger, 2011 ND 134; Vanlishout v. ND Dept. of Transportation, 2011 ND 138; State v. Blunt (Cross-reference w/20070247 & 20090110), 2011 ND 127; Silliman v. All American Biodiesel, Inc., 2011 ND 54; State v. Tompkins, 2011 ND 61; Kalvoda v. Bismarck Public School Dist. #1, 2011 ND 32; Pember v. Shapiro, 2011 ND 31; State v. Huber, 2011 ND 23; Matter of G.R.H. (CONFIDENTIAL), 2011 ND 21; Guardianship/Conservatorship of G.L., 2011 ND 10; Curran v. N.D. Workforce Safety & Insurance, 2010 ND 227; State v. Huether, 2010 ND 233; Wong v. State, 2010 ND 219; JLY Transport v. WSI, 2010 ND 215; State v. Walker, 2010 ND 214; Hoggarth, et al. v. Kropp, 2010 ND 197; R.F. v. M.M., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL), 2010 ND 195; Johnson v. N.D. Workforce Safety & Insurance, et al., 2010 ND 198; State v. Adams, 2010 ND 184; Peterson v. Peterson, 2010 ND 165; Estate of Cashmore, 2010 ND 159; Lechler v. Lechler, 2010 ND 158; Interest of M.G. (CONFIDENTIAL), 2010 ND 157; Praus v. Praus, 2010 ND 156; State v. Blunt (cross-reference w/20070247), 2010 ND 144; Workforce Safety & Insurance v. Auck, 2010 ND 126; Lenton v. Lenton, 2010 ND 125; State v. Pixler (Consolidated w/20090311), 2010 ND 105; State v. Clark (Consolidated w/20090234-20090238), 2010 ND 106; Matter of Midgett (Cross-Ref w/20080255 & 20070109), 2010 ND 98; Stenehjem, ex rel. v. Crosslands, Inc., 2010 ND 91; Dupay v. Dupay, 2010 ND 87; Davidson v. State, 2010 ND 68; State v. Loh (CONSOLIDATED W/20090099), 2010 ND 66; Davis v. Davis, 2010 ND 67; Odom v. State (Consolidated w/ 20090249), 2010 ND 65; Parisien v. Parisien, 2010 ND 35; In re Berger ex rel. Kcf, 2010 ND 28; Cartier, et al. v. Northwestern Electric, Inc., 2010 ND 14; In re Hanenberg, 2010 ND 8; State v. Thompson, 2010 ND 10

2000s (231): Lucas v. Riverside Park Condominiums Unit Owners Association, 2009 ND 217; Conservatorship of T.K., 2009 ND 195; Tweeten v. Tweeten, 2009 ND 164; Frueh v. Frueh, 2009 ND 155; Beeter, et al. v. Sawyer Disposal, 2009 ND 153; State v. Procive, 2009 ND 151; State v. Beane (Consolidated w/20090012 - 20090015), 2009 ND 146; Steinmeyer v. Department of Transportation, 2009 ND 126; State v. Neva, 2009 ND 127; City of Grand Forks v. Corman, 2009 ND 125; Vicknair, et al. v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc., et al., 2009 ND 113; State v. Golden, 2009 ND 108; Matter of A.M., 2009 ND 104; Haugrose v. Anderson, 2009 ND 81; Kovarik v. Kovarik, 2009 ND 82; Frokjer v. ND Board of Dental Examiners, 2009 ND 79; Matter of D.V.A. (CONFIDENTIAL), 2009 ND 75; Langer, et al. v. Pender, et al., 2009 ND 51; State v. Foreid, 2009 ND 41; Gunia v. Gunia, 2009 ND 32; Bruder v. WSI, et al., 2009 ND 23; Adoption of H.G.C., 2009 ND 19; City of Fargo v. Salsman, 2009 ND 15; Gustafson v. Gustafson, 2008 ND 233; Serr v. Serr (Cross-Ref w/20070231), 2008 ND 229; Matter of G.R.H., 2008 ND 222; State v. Harlan, 2008 ND 220; Aasmundstad, et al. v. State of ND, et al., 2008 ND 206; Matter of M.D. (CONFIDENTIAL), 2008 ND 208; Halvorson v. Sentry Insurance, 2008 ND 205; State v. McAvoy, 2008 ND 204; Drayton v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al., 2008 ND 178; Buchholz, et al. v. Burlington Resources (consolidated w/20080027), 2008 ND 173; Ongstad, et al. v. Piper Jaffray & Co., 2008 ND 167; Coughlin Construction v. Nu-Tec Industries, et al., 2008 ND 163; Hutchinson v. Boyle (Consolidated w/20080010), 2008 ND 150; State v. Blunt, 2008 ND 135; Barros v. ND Dept. of Transportation, 2008 ND 132; Baukol Builders v. County of Grand Forks, 2008 ND 116; Olson v. State, 2008 ND 113; State v. Nastrom, 2008 ND 110; Ike v. Director, N.D. Dept. of Transportation, 2008 ND 85; Waldie v. Waldie, 2008 ND 97; Ward, et al. v. Bullis, et al., 2008 ND 80; Sandvick, et al. v. LaCrosse, et al., 2008 ND 77; State v. Hidanovic, 2008 ND 66; Bateman v. City of Grand Forks, 2008 ND 72; State v. Brockel, 2008 ND 50; Frueh v. Frueh, 2008 ND 26; State v. Desjarlais (Consolidated w/20070157), 2008 ND 13; Overland v. Overland, 2008 ND 6; Leno v. Department of Transportation, 2008 ND 10; Manitoba Public Ins. Corp. v. Dakota Fire Ins. Co., 2007 ND 206; Christian v. Christian, 2007 ND 196; Intercept Corp. v. Calima Financial LLC, et al., 2007 ND 180; State v. McAvoy, 2007 ND 178; Bertsch v. Bertsch, 2007 ND 168; Interest of T. E. (Confidential), 2007 ND 166; State v. Muhle (Cross-reference w/20060328), 2007 ND 131; J.P. v. Stark Co. Social Services, et al., 2007 ND 140; Home of Economy v. Burlington Northern, 2007 ND 127; Silbernagel, et al. v. Silbernagel, et al., 2007 ND 124; State v. Gaede, 2007 ND 125; State v. Schweitzer, 2007 ND 122; Scheer v. Altru Health System, et al., 2007 ND 104; Moore v. State, 2007 ND 96; State v. Dennis, 2007 ND 87; Matter of Anderson, 2007 ND 50; State v. Frohlich, 2007 ND 45; State v. Mulske, 2007 ND 43; State v. Austin (CONSOLIDATED W/ 20060194), 2007 ND 30; State v. Duchene, 2007 ND 31; State v. Streeper, 2007 ND 25; Stockman Bank of Montana v. AGSCO, Inc., et al., 2007 ND 27; B.J. Kadrmas, Inc. v. Oxbow Energy, 2007 ND 12; State v. Stensaker (consolidated w/20050454), 2007 ND 6; State v. Wardner, 2006 ND 256; Klein v. Larson, 2006 ND 236; Dunnuck v. Dunnuck, 2006 ND 247; State v. Jacob, 2006 ND 246; Eifert v. Eifert, 2006 ND 240; Tverberg v. Workforce Safety & Insurance, et al., 2006 ND 229; Eichhorn v. The Waldo Township Bd. of Supervisors, et al., 2006 ND 214; Livinggood v. Balsdon, 2006 ND 215; State v. Graf (Consolidated w/20050411-20050417), 2006 ND 196; Tibert, et al. v. City of Minto, 2006 ND 189; STATE ex rel. BD. OF UNIV. v. Alexander, 2006 ND 144; State v. Manning, 2006 ND 125; Ballensky v. Flattum-Riemers, et al., 2006 ND 127; University Hotel Development v. Dusterhoft Oil, Inc., et al., 2006 ND 121; Roth v. Hoffer, 2006 ND 119; Kostelecky v. Kostelecky, 2006 ND 120; Haugen v. BioLife Plasma Services, et al., 2006 ND 117; Johnson v. State, 2006 ND 122; Landers, et al. v. Biwer, et al., 2006 ND 109; Knutson, et al. v. City of Fargo, 2006 ND 97; Steen and Berg Co. v. Berg, 2006 ND 86; Choice Financial Group v. Schellpfeffer, et al. (Cross-Ref w/20040204), 2006 ND 87; State v. Moran, 2006 ND 62; Matter of G.R.H., 2006 ND 56; Rothberg v. Rothberg, 2006 ND 65; State v. Stavig, 2006 ND 63; Beckler v. Bismarck Public School Dist., 2006 ND 58; Kramer v. Kramer, 2006 ND 64; Manning v. Manning, 2006 ND 67; State v. Bergstrom, 2006 ND 45; Maynard v. McNett, 2006 ND 36; Simon v. Simon (Consolidated w/20050356), 2006 ND 29; Wheeler v. Gardner, 2006 ND 24; Perez v. Nichols, 2006 ND 20; Schwan v. Folden, 2006 ND 28; Curtis Construction Co., Inc. v. American Steel Span, Inc., et al., 2005 ND 218; State v. Hernandez, 2005 ND 214; Wright v. State, 2005 ND 217; Gray v. N.D. Game and Fish Dept., 2005 ND 204; Wetzel v. Schlenvogt (CONSOLIDATED W/20050122), 2005 ND 190; State v. Laib, 2005 ND 191; Bjerklie v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, 2005 ND 178; Heart River Partners, et al. v. Goetzfried, et al., 2005 ND 149; Miller, et al. v. Diamond Resources, Inc., 2005 ND 150; Interest of B.J.K., 2005 ND 138; City of Bismarck v. Judkins, 2005 ND 143; Citibank v. Reikowski, 2005 ND 133; Martin v. Stutsman Co. Social Services, et al., 2005 ND 117; Martin, et al. v. Berg, et al., 2005 ND 108; Klindt, et al. v. Pembina Co. Water Resource Bd., et al., 2005 ND 106; Estate of Kimbrell (Consolidated w/20040322), 2005 ND 107; ND Human Rights Coalition, et al. v. Bertsch, 2005 ND 98; Edinger v. Governing Authority of Stutsman Co. Correctional Center, 2005 ND 79; Hanson v. Hanson, 2005 ND 82; State ex rel. State Fire & Tornado Fund of the North Dakota Insurance Department v. North Dakota State University, 2005 ND 75; Larson v. Larson, 2005 ND 67; Dvorak v. Dvorak, 2005 ND 66; Makeeff v. City of Bismarck, 2005 ND 60; Sweeney v. Sweeney (Cross-Ref. w/20010129), 2005 ND 47; Kaiser v. State, 2005 ND 49; Pratt v. Altendorf, 2005 ND 32; State v. Klindtworth, 2005 ND 18; Ziegler, et al. v. Dahl, et al., 2005 ND 10; Jones v. ND State Board of Medical Examiners, 2005 ND 22; State v. Smith (Consolidated w/20040115), 2005 ND 21; Bolinske v. Herd, et al., 2004 ND 217; Forster v. West Dakota Veterinary Clinic, et al., 2004 ND 207; Jensen v. State (Cross-reference w/20010097 & 20020166), 2004 ND 200; Schmidt, et al. v. Wittinger, 2004 ND 189; Estate of Gross v. ND Dept. of Human Services, 2004 ND 190; Evenson v. Quantum Industries, Inc., et al., 2004 ND 178; State v. Lee, 2004 ND 176; State v. Mitzel, 2004 ND 157; Gonzalez v. Tounjian, et al. (Cross-reference w/20020263), 2004 ND 156; State v. Stockert, 2004 ND 146; Adoption of S.R.F. (CONFIDENTIAL), 2004 ND 150; Interest of T.T., 2004 ND 138; Bice, et al. v. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C., et al., 2004 ND 113; Ritter, Laber & Assoc., et al. v. Koch Oil, et al. (Cross w/990204 & 20000224), 2004 ND 117; City of Mandan v. Sperle, 2004 ND 114; Airport Inn Enterprises, Inc. v. Ramage, 2004 ND 92; Jaste v. Gailfus, et al., 2004 ND 94; Keller v. Bolding, 2004 ND 80; Rydberg, et al. v. Rydberg, 2004 ND 73; Oldham v. Oldham, 2004 ND 62; Ensign v. Bank of Baker, 2004 ND 56; Interest of K.P., 2004 ND 52; Harfield, et al. v. Tate (Cross-ref. w/19980345), 2004 ND 45; Amsbaugh v. Amsbaugh, 2004 ND 11; Morton Co. S.S.B., et al. v. Schumacher, 2004 ND 31; Gratech Co., Ltd. v. Wold Engineering, P.C., 2003 ND 200; Fish v. Dockter, 2003 ND 185; Christianson v. Christianson, 2003 ND 186; Hanson v. Director, N.D. Dept. of Trans., 2003 ND 175; State v. Beciraj (see Docket Memo), 2003 ND 173; McDowell v. McDowell (cross-ref. w/20010056), 2003 ND 174; Wangler v. Lerol, et al., 2003 ND 164; Grewal v. ND Association of Counties, et al., 2003 ND 156; Valley Honey Co. v. Graves, et al., 2003 ND 125; Ringsaker v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, 2003 ND 122; Bladow v. Bladow, 2003 ND 123; Tarnavsky v. Tarnavsky, et al., 2003 ND 110; Coons v. Coons, 2003 ND 115; State v. Matthews, 2003 ND 108; Hogan v. Hogan, 2003 ND 105; State v. Thorson, 2003 ND 76; Bachmeier v. Workers Comp. et al., 2003 ND 63; Koapke v. Herfendal, et al., 2003 ND 64; Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. Center Mutual Insurance Company, 2003 ND 50; Morris v. Job Service, 2003 ND 45; Amyotte v. Rolette Co. Housing Authority, 2003 ND 48; Rittenour, et al. v. Gibson, 2003 ND 14; Hartman v. Estate of Miller, et al., 2003 ND 24; Grand Forks Professional Baseball, Inc., et al. v. Workers Comp., 2002 ND 204; Adoption of S.A.L., 2002 ND 178; Abel v. Allen, 2002 ND 147; Kautzman v. Kautzman (Cross-ref.w/980004,990328,990386 & 20000083), 2002 ND 118; Nodak Mutual Ins. Co., et al. v. Stegman, et al. (Cross-Ref w/20000074), 2002 ND 113; State v. Guthmiller (cross-reference 20020088), 2002 ND 116; Phipps v. ND Dept. of Transportation, 2002 ND 112; Paul v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau, 2002 ND 96; Harger v. Harger, 2002 ND 76; Olander Contracting v. Gail Wachter Investments, et al., 2002 ND 65; Dalan v. Paracelsus Healthcare Corp., 2002 ND 46; Knutson v. Knutson, 2002 ND 29; City of Devils Lake v. Lawrence, 2002 ND 31; Bertsch, et al. v. Duemeland, et al. (cross-ref. w/20040055), 2002 ND 32; Jaskoviak v. Gruver, et al., 2002 ND 1; Interest of M.C.H., 2001 ND 205; DeCoteau v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. (Cross-reference w/19990100), 2001 ND 182; McKenzie Co. Social Service Bd., et al. v. C.G. (CONFIDENTIAL), 2001 ND 151; Flattum-Riemers v. Peters-Riemers (CONFIDENTIAL), 2001 ND 121; Anderson v. Meyer Broadcasting Co., 2001 ND 125; Larson v. Norkot Manufacturing, et al., 2001 ND 103; James, et al. v. Griffin, et al., 2001 ND 90; Estate of Murphy, et al. v. Maus, et al., 2001 ND 87; McPhee, et al. v. Tufty, et al., 2001 ND 51; Horsley v. ND Workers Comp., et al., 2001 ND 60; Albrecht v. Metro Area Ambulance, et al. (Cross Ref. w/19970319), 2001 ND 61; Lukenbill, et al. v. Fettig, 2001 ND 47; Interest of J.S., 2001 ND 10; Nord, et al. v. Herrman, et al., 2001 ND 11; Schultze v. Continental Ins. Co., 2000 ND 209; City of Fargo v. Egeberg, 2000 ND 159; State v. Norton, 2000 ND 153; Cox v. Cox, 2000 ND 144; Houn v. ND Dept. of Transportation, 2000 ND 131; Kautzman v. Kautzman(consol. w/990386, Cross w/980004 & 20000083), 2000 ND 116; Thompson v. Associated Potato Growers, et al., 2000 ND 95; Mountrail County v. Hoffman, 2000 ND 49; Van Valkenburg, et al. v. Paracelsus Healthcare Corp., et al., 2000 ND 38; Berg v. Berg, 2000 ND 36; Steiner v. Ford Motor Co., 2000 ND 31; Developmental Center v. Central Personnel Div., et al., 2000 ND 7; DeCoteau v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.(cross-reference w/20010066), 2000 ND 3

1990s (88): Dozier v. Williams Co. Social Service Board, et al., 1999 ND 240; Bjerke v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau, et al., 1999 ND 180; Gottbreht v. State of ND, et al., 1999 ND 159; Henderson v. Henderson, 1999 ND 156; Treiber v. Elmer, et al., 1999 ND 130; Bruns v. ND Workers Comp., et al., 1999 ND 116; Blikre, et al. v.ACandS, Inc., et al. (CONSOLIDATED W/ 980308-980311), 1999 ND 96; Haff v. Hettich, et al., 1999 ND 94; Joseph Clarys v. Ford Motor Company, 1999 ND 72; Fox v. Fox, 1999 ND 68; State of North Dakota v. Glenda Jones, 1999 ND 61; Stuart v. Stammen, 1999 ND 38; Paul Vraa v. The North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau and North Dakota Mill & Elevator, 1999 ND 6; Schmalle v. Schmalle, 1998 ND 201; Susan Lea Olson v. Howard James Olson, 1998 ND 190; Jarvis v. Jarvis, 1998 ND 163; Close v. Ebertz, 1998 ND 167; Rydberg v. Johnson, 1998 ND 160; Swenson v. Raumin, 1998 ND 150; Judy Ann Wilhelm v. Jeffrey Dean Wilhelm, 1998 ND 140; State of North Dakota v. Adrian M. Spath, 1998 ND 133; Mougey Farms v. Kaspari, et al., 1998 ND 118; Wagner v. Wagner, 1998 ND 117; State of North Dakota v. Leonard Wayne Burckhard, 1998 ND 121; Billey v. North Dakota Stockmen's Association, 1998 ND 120; In the Interest of J.S., 1998 ND 92; Moch v. Moch, et al., 1998 ND 95; City of Fargo v. Allan Kermit Bakkerud, 1998 ND 77; The Perry Center, Inc. v. Heidi Heitkamp, 1998 ND 78; State of North Dakota v. Michael Todd Serr and Karmon Michelle Koble, 1998 ND 66; Fode v. Capital RV Center, Inc., 1998 ND 65; Loberg v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau and Fargo Assembly Company, 1998 ND 64; Wahl v. Morton County Social Services, 1998 ND 48; State of North Dakota v. Jarel Aaron Olson, 1998 ND 41; Hopfauf v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau, 1998 ND 40; Griffeth v. Eid, 1998 ND 38; In the Interest of R.D.B., a child; Jason Dellwo v. R.D.B., a child, and D.B. and M.B., his parents, 1998 ND 15; Kevin Hust v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau and Moos Trucking, 1998 ND 20; Flink v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau, 1998 ND 11; Kasprowicz v. Finck, 1998 ND 4; Struksnes, et al. v. Kevin's Plumbing & Heating, Inc., et al., 1997 ND 245; State v. Harmon (CONSOL. w/960207-960208; 970100-970102), 1997 ND 233; State v. Magnuson, 1997 ND 228; Larson v. Moore, Director, ND DOT, 1997 ND 227; Withey v. Hager (CROSS REFERENCE W/ 950122), 1997 ND 225; Falcon v. State (Cross-reference w/ 950314), 1997 ND 200; State v. Hart, 1997 ND 188; Wheeling v. Director, N.D. DOT, 1997 ND 193; Long v. University of North Dakota, 1997 ND 174; Volunteer Firefighters v. Turtle Mountain Gas and Oil, Inc., Ranger Oil Company, and Ampolex, Texas, Inc., 1997 ND 169; Workers Compensation Bureau v. William McCollum, 1997 ND 163; Director of the North Dakota Department of Transportation v. Luke Kahl, 1997 ND 147; Little v. Traynor, 1997 ND 128; T.J.E., Jr. v. M.H., 1997 ND 99; Neset v. First Bank, 1997 ND 4; North Dakota Department of Transportation v. Brian Dewain Nelson, 1997 ND 81; Matter of Estate of Peterson, 1997 ND 48; Keator v. Gale, 1997 ND 46; Monge v. Goter, 1997 ND 28; State v. Klein, 1997 ND 25; Trollwood Village Limited Partnership v. Cass County Bd. of County Commissioners, 1996 ND 231; Holzer v. Jochim, 1996 ND 226; First American Bank West v. Berdahl, 1996 ND 209; State v. Huber, 1996 ND 207; State v. Shepherd, 1996 ND 198; Matter of Estate of Murphy, 1996 ND 184; Ridl v. EP Operating Ltd. Partnership, 1996 ND 181; Matter of Estate of Nelson, 1996 ND 179; Fahlsing v. Teters, 1996 ND 160; City of Grand Forks v. Dohman, 1996 ND 137; Walton v. North Dakota Department of Human Services, 1996 ND 141; Raboin v. North Dakota Department of Human Services, 1996 ND 140; State v. McDonell, 1996 ND 117; State v. Touche, 1996 ND 116; Esselman v. Job Service North Dakota, 1996 ND 110; Schutt v. Schumacher, 1996 ND 107; Mertes v. Walberg, 1996 ND 105; State v. Ripley, 1996 ND 101; State v. Trosen, 1996 ND 96; Muscatell v. North Dakota Real Estate Commission, 1996 ND 88; Diegel v. City of West Fargo, 1996 ND 87; State v. Falcon, 1996 ND 86; State v. Carriere, 1996 ND 74; State v. Glaesman, 1996 ND 64; State v. Zurmiller, 1996 ND 45; Zimmerman v. North Dakota Department of Transportation Director, 1996 ND 35; State v. Boehler, 1996 ND 26; Lire, Inc. v. Bob's Pizza Inn Restaurants, Inc., 1995 ND 207

The sidebar keeps a curated digest; this page is the complete record.