Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- artvi:sec4:sidebar [2023/02/15 16:07] – admin
+++ artvi:sec4:sidebar [2024/12/16 20:46] (current) – Added new treatise admin
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
   - State ex rel. Mason v. Baker, [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3935373/state-ex-rel-mason-v-baker/|69 N.D. 488]] (1939)
   - Langer v. Olson, [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6850822/state-ex-rel-langer-v-olson/|44 N.D. 614]], 640 (N.D. 1920) (Robinson, J., dissenting) (discussing 4/5 majority requirement)
+  - City of Bismarck v. Materi, 177 N.W.2d 530, 537 (N.D. 1970) (discussing application to ordinances)
+  - Bismarck Pub. Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. State, 511 N.W.2d 247, 250 (N.D. 1994)
+  - N. Dakota State Bd. of Higher Educ. v. Jaeger, 2012 ND 64, ¶ 2
+  - MKB Mgmt. Corp. v. Burdick, 2014 ND 197, ¶ 1
+== Parallel Provisions ==
+  - [[https://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/Current/PDF/Constitution/constitution.pdf|Nebr. Const.]] art. V, sec. 2 ("The Supreme Court shall consist of seven judges. . . .  No legislative act shall be held unconstitutional except by the concurrence of five judges.")
+== Scholarly Works ==
+  - Mauro Arturo Rivera León, [[https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-mono/10.4324/9781003458272/supermajorities-constitutional-courts-mauro-arturo-rivera-le%C3%B3n?context=ubx&refId=47017349-4c30-4837-9095-4aea348d01b2|Supermajorities in Constitutional Courts]] (2024)
 == Prior Versions ==