User Tools

Site Tools


enabling_act

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
enabling_act [2020/07/11 18:55] jetenabling_act [2020/07/12 03:21] (current) jet
Line 113: Line 113:
 under section 4 of the Enabling Act, congress could enact an act making under section 4 of the Enabling Act, congress could enact an act making
 criminal the introduction of intoxicating liquor upon an allotment within the criminal the introduction of intoxicating liquor upon an allotment within the
-limits of an Indian reservation. United States v. Sutton, 215 U.S. 291, 30 S. +limits of an Indian reservation. United States v. Sutton, [[https://courtlistener.com/c/U.S./215/291/|215 U.S. 291]], 30 S.Ct. 116, 54 L. Ed.  200 (1909).
-Ct. 116, 54 L. Ed.  200 (1909).+
  
 Lands within South Dakota which were formerly a part of an Indian reservation Lands within South Dakota which were formerly a part of an Indian reservation
 and not restored to the public domain and open to settlement, but held by an and not restored to the public domain and open to settlement, but held by an
 Indian allottee under a trust patent, are Indian lands over which the United Indian allottee under a trust patent, are Indian lands over which the United
-States has exclusive jurisdiction. Ex Parte Van Moore, 221 F. 954 (D. S.D. +States has exclusive jurisdiction. Ex Parte Van Moore, 221 F. 954 (D. S.D. 1915).
-1915).+
  
 Under the Enabling Act and the disclaimer provision in the Constitution of Under the Enabling Act and the disclaimer provision in the Constitution of
Line 130: Line 128:
 Whether Indian pantentees of land in a reservation, created by Indian treaty, Whether Indian pantentees of land in a reservation, created by Indian treaty,
 took to high or low watermark of a lake was not a question of state law. took to high or low watermark of a lake was not a question of state law.
-Montana Power Co. v. Rochester, 127 F.2d 189 (9th Cir. 1942).+Montana Power Co. v. Rochester, [[https://courtlistener.com/c/F.2d/127/189/|127 F.2d 189]] (9th Cir. 1942).
  
 == -Jurisdiction of State. == == -Jurisdiction of State. ==
Line 138: Line 136:
 reserve to the United States exclusive jurisdiction of civil causes of action reserve to the United States exclusive jurisdiction of civil causes of action
 not involving lands, between Indians residing on reservations. Vermilion v. not involving lands, between Indians residing on reservations. Vermilion v.
-Spotted Elk, 85 N.W.2d 432 (N.D. 1957).+Spotted Elk, [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/3777337?bookname=public_url&ci=95|85 N.W.2d 432]] (N.D. 1957).
  
 == -Voting Rights of Indians. == == -Voting Rights of Indians. ==
Line 146: Line 144:
 of an Indian reservation, where the territory had, under an act of Congress, of an Indian reservation, where the territory had, under an act of Congress,
 been allotted to certain Indians and they were living upon the allotments and been allotted to certain Indians and they were living upon the allotments and
-farming the same. State ex rel.  Tompton v. Denoyer, 6 N.D. 586, 72 N.W. 1014+farming the same. State ex rel.  Tompton v. Denoyer, [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/3777338?bookname=public_url&ci=95|6 N.D. 586]], 72 N.W. 1014
 (1897). (1897).
  
Line 153: Line 151:
 An act of the territorial legislature organizing an independent school district An act of the territorial legislature organizing an independent school district
 was subject to amendment by the state legislature. Jones v. Brightwood Indep. was subject to amendment by the state legislature. Jones v. Brightwood Indep.
-Sch. Dist., 63 N.D. 275, 247 N.W. 884 (1933).+Sch. Dist., [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/3777341?bookname=public_url&ci=95|63 N.D. 275]], 247 N.W. 884 (1933).
  
 == State Political and Governmental Control. == == State Political and Governmental Control. ==
Line 161: Line 159:
 not expressly reserved in the Congress of the United States, over certain not expressly reserved in the Congress of the United States, over certain
 territory embraced in what is known as the Ft. Berthold Indian reservation. territory embraced in what is known as the Ft. Berthold Indian reservation.
-State ex rel. Baker v. Mountrail County, 28 N.D. 389, 149 N.W. 120 (1914).+State ex rel. Baker v. Mountrail County, [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/3777342?bookname=public_url&ci=95|28 N.D. 389]], 149 N.W. 120 (1914).
  
 The state may rightfully exercise political and governmental control over lands The state may rightfully exercise political and governmental control over lands
Line 167: Line 165:
 Indian school and Indian agency purposes, to the extent of including them Indian school and Indian agency purposes, to the extent of including them
 within its political subdivisions for political and governmental purposes. La within its political subdivisions for political and governmental purposes. La
-Duke v. Melin, 45 N.D. 349, 177 N.W. 673 (1920).+Duke v. Melin, [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/3777343?bookname=public_url&ci=95|45 N.D. 349]], 177 N.W. 673 (1920).
  
 == Unappropriated Public Lands. == == Unappropriated Public Lands. ==
Line 173: Line 171:
 The beds of navigable streams are not "unappropriated public lands" included The beds of navigable streams are not "unappropriated public lands" included
 within the disclaimer of title contained in section 4 of the Enabling Act. within the disclaimer of title contained in section 4 of the Enabling Act.
-State v. Loy, 74 N.D. 182, 20 N.W.2d 668 (1945).+State v. Loy, [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/1661851?bookname=public_url&ci=95|74 N.D. 182]], 20 N.W.2d 668 (1945).
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
Line 288: Line 286:
 upon the question of its adoption and upon the question of the adoption of the upon the question of its adoption and upon the question of the adoption of the
 Constitution was legally adopted though it failed to receive a majority of Constitution was legally adopted though it failed to receive a majority of
-votes cast for governor. State ex rel. Larabee v. Barnes, 3 N.D. 319, 55 N.W.+votes cast for governor. State ex rel. Larabee v. Barnes, [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/3777349?bookname=public_url&ci=95|3 N.D. 319]], 55 N.W.
 883 (1893). 883 (1893).
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
Line 342: Line 340:
 permanency of the funds acquired through the grant. The state is limited to the permanency of the funds acquired through the grant. The state is limited to the
 use of the interest from the permanent fund and the interest shall be used only use of the interest from the permanent fund and the interest shall be used only
-for the support of schools. State ex rel. Bd. Of Univ. & Sch. Lands v. +for the support of schools.  
-McMillan, 12 N.D. 280, 96 N.W. 310 (1903), distinguished, Lang v. City of +State ex rel. Bd. Of Univ. & Sch. Lands v. McMillan,  
-Cavalier, 59 N.D. 75, 228 N.W. 819 (1930).+[[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/2530415?bookname=public_url&ci=95|12 N.D. 280]], 96 N.W. 310 (1903), distinguished,  
 +Lang v. City of Cavalier, [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/1083924?bookname=public_url&ci=95|59 N.D. 75]], 228 N.W. 819 (1930).
  
 The assembly cannot divert nor authorize diversion of any part of the principal The assembly cannot divert nor authorize diversion of any part of the principal
Line 353: Line 352:
 an individual, by the assembly directly, or by the board of university and an individual, by the assembly directly, or by the board of university and
 school lands by legislative enactment is unconstitutional. State ex rel. Sathre school lands by legislative enactment is unconstitutional. State ex rel. Sathre
-v. Board of Univ. & Sch. Lands, 65 N.D. 687, 262 N.W. 60 (1935).+v. Board of Univ. & Sch. Lands, [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/3777356?bookname=public_url&ci=95|65 N.D. 687]], 262 N.W. 60 (1935).
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
Line 430: Line 429:
 highway commission contemplates that title to lands shall be acquired, such highway commission contemplates that title to lands shall be acquired, such
 procedure cannot be resorted to acquire school land granted to the state. State procedure cannot be resorted to acquire school land granted to the state. State
-Hwy. Comm'n v. State, 70 N. D. 673, 297 N.W. 194 (1940).+Hwy. Comm'n v. State, [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/3777362?bookname=public_url&ci=95|70 N. D. 673]], 297 N.W. 194 (1940).
  
 == Oil and Gas Leases == == Oil and Gas Leases ==
Line 436: Line 435:
 Under the Enabling Act, as amended, the state has full power to provide for the Under the Enabling Act, as amended, the state has full power to provide for the
 execution of oil and gas leases on school and university lands. State ex rel. execution of oil and gas leases on school and university lands. State ex rel.
-Rausch v. Amerada Petro. Corp., 78 N.D. 247, 49 N.W.2d 14 (1951).+Rausch v. Amerada Petro. Corp., [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/1329043?bookname=public_url&ci=95|78 N.D. 247]], 49 N.W.2d 14 (1951).
  
 == Taxation == == Taxation ==
Line 443: Line 442:
 the state, and no interest in the land is subject to taxation until a resale or the state, and no interest in the land is subject to taxation until a resale or
 redemption is made. Upon reversion of the land to the state, all unpaid taxes redemption is made. Upon reversion of the land to the state, all unpaid taxes
-levied thereon are canceled. State v. Towner County, 68 N.D. 629, 283 N.W. 63+levied thereon are canceled. State v. Towner County, [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/3777360?bookname=public_url&ci=95|68 N.D. 629]], 283 N.W. 63
 (1938). (1938).
  
Line 570: Line 569:
 The power to determine the manner of the use of public lands granted by the The power to determine the manner of the use of public lands granted by the
 Enabling Act is purely legislative and cannot be delegated to a commission. Enabling Act is purely legislative and cannot be delegated to a commission.
-State ex rel. Rusk v. Budge, 14 N.D. 532, 105 N.W. 724 (1905), distinguished, +State ex rel. Rusk v. Budge, [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/3777334?bookname=public_url&ci=95|14 N.D. 532]], 105 N.W. 724 (1905), distinguished, 
-More v. Western Grain Co., 37 N.D. 547, 164 N.W. 294 (1917).+More v. Western Grain Co., [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/3777335?bookname=public_url&ci=95|37 N.D. 547]], 164 N.W. 294 (1917).
  
 == Charitable Purposes. == == Charitable Purposes. ==
Line 588: Line 587:
 purposes of the grant of land made by congress to the state for public purposes of the grant of land made by congress to the state for public
 buildings at the capital under the Enabling Act.  State ex rel. Rusk v. Budge, buildings at the capital under the Enabling Act.  State ex rel. Rusk v. Budge,
-14 N.D. 532, 105 N.W. 724 (1905), distinguished, More v. Western Grain Co., 37 +[[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/3777334?bookname=public_url&ci=95|14 N.D. 532]], 105 N.W. 724 (1905), distinguished, More v. Western Grain Co., [[https://links.casemakerlegal.com/docid/3777335?bookname=public_url&ci=95|37 N.D. 547]], 164 N.W. 294 (1917).
-N.D. 547, 164 N.W. 294 (1917).+
  
 == Limitation on Legislative Disposal of Lands. == == Limitation on Legislative Disposal of Lands. ==
Line 595: Line 593:
 The Montana legislature must act in subordination to the state Constitution in The Montana legislature must act in subordination to the state Constitution in
 executing the authority entrusted to it in section 17 of the Enabling Act. executing the authority entrusted to it in section 17 of the Enabling Act.
-Montana ex rel. Haire v. Rice, 204 U.S. 291, 27 S. Ct. 281, 51 L. Ed. 490+Montana ex rel. Haire v. Rice, [[https://courtlistener.com/c/U.S./204/291/|204 U.S. 291]], 27 S. Ct. 281, 51 L. Ed. 490
 (1907). (1907).
  
enabling_act.1594493717.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/07/11 18:55 by jet

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC0 1.0 Universal
CC0 1.0 Universal Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki