User Tools

Site Tools


artiv:sec12:research

N.D. Const. art. IV, § 12 — Research

Quorum; Rules of Procedure. Text of the section: current and prior versions.

Every citing reference in the corpus: 2 court opinions and 8 Attorney General opinions. Counts include the section's pre-1981 designation (§ 36), era-gated by the renumbering crosswalk.

Generated from the citation graph of the validated corpus. Treatment groupings (construing / citing / recital) are heuristic reading aids, not editorial judgments — read the opinion before relying on any signal.

Cases by topic

Topics are machine-generated groupings of the citing references — reading aids, not editorial judgments. Documents cited after the last classification pass appear in the lists below until the next pass.

Judging members' qualifications and elections
  • Onstad v. Jaeger, et al., 2020 ND 203 (2020, per curiam) · quotes the provision
    • ¶ 4: “…In a letter dated September 9, 2020, Jaeger denied Onstad's request. Jaeger stated he was unable to comply with Onstad's request and explained N.D. Const. art. IV, § 12 states that each house is the judge of the qualifications of its members. Jaeger also explained, "Additionally, last Friday I forwarded to the County Auditors my certification of the ballot for the November General Elec…”
Internal rules and legislative procedure
Enactment, budgeting, and relations with the executive

The sidebar keeps a curated digest; this page is the complete record.

artiv/sec12/research.txt · Last modified: by claude

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC0 1.0 Universal
CC0 1.0 Universal Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki