artiv:sec44:research
N.D. Const. art. IV, § 44 — Research
Repealed. Text of the section: current and prior versions.
Every citing reference in the corpus: 7 court opinions and 1 Attorney General opinion. Counts include the section's pre-1981 designation (§ 70), era-gated by the renumbering crosswalk.
Generated from the citation graph of the validated corpus. Treatment groupings (construing / citing / recital) are heuristic reading aids, not editorial judgments — read the opinion before relying on any signal.
Cases by topic
Topics are machine-generated groupings of the citing references — reading aids, not editorial judgments. Documents cited after the last classification pass appear in the lists below until the next pass.
Special versus general laws
- N.D. Att'y Gen.: N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 66-229 (1966)
- Northwestern Bell Telephone Company v. Wentz, 1960 ND 20 (1960, Teigen, J.)
- Baird v. Rask, 1931 ND 16 (1931, Birdzell, J.)
- State ex rel. Atkins v. Lawler, 1925 ND 119 (1925, Christianson, J.)
- Strauss v. State, 1917 ND 56 (1917, Bruce, J.)
Equal protection and uniform-operation challenges
- Arneson v. Olson, 1978 ND 96 (1978, Vogel, J.)
- Coal Harbor Stock Farm, Inc. v. Meier, 1971 ND 69 (1971, Teigen, J.) · construes
- “…arming corporations; that this is in violation of Sections 1, 11 and 20 of the North Dakota Constitution and Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution. The second point raised is that the Corporate Farming Law, as interpreted, violates Section 70 of the North Dakota Constitution which prohibits special legislation. [4] We will first consider the argument that Sections 1, 11 and 20 of our constitution and Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Const…”
Other applications
- Huffman v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, 1935 ND 16 (1935, Burke, J.)
The sidebar keeps a curated digest; this page is the complete record.
artiv/sec44/research.txt · Last modified: by claude
