Repealed. Text of the section: current and prior versions.

Every citing reference in the corpus: 8 court opinions and 1 Attorney General opinion. Counts include the section's pre-1981 designation (§ 142), era-gated by the renumbering crosswalk.

Generated from the citation graph of the validated corpus. Treatment groupings (construing / citing / recital) are heuristic reading aids, not editorial judgments — read the opinion before relying on any signal.

Topics are machine-generated groupings of the citing references — reading aids, not editorial judgments. Documents cited after the last classification pass appear in the lists below until the next pass.

• Home of Economy v. Burlington Northern, 2007 ND 127 (2007, Sandstrom, J.)
• Home of Economy v. Burlington Northern, 2005 ND 74 (2005, Maring, J.)
• Minto Grain v. Tibert, et al. (Cross-Ref w/20010302, 20030207 & 208), 2004 ND 107 (2004, Maring, J.)
• Nowling, et al. v. BNSF Railway, et al., 2002 ND 104 (2002, VandeWalle, J.)

• N.D. Att'y Gen.: N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 76-28 (1976)
• Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Washburn Lignite Coal Co., 1918 ND 82 (1918, Birdzell, J.)
• C. L. Merrick Co. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co., 1916 ND 165 (1916, Fisk, J.) · construes
  • “…ion and necessary effect of the judgment last referred to was to finally determine that said chapter 51, as applied to this defendant, was unconstitutional from the date of its enactment, and that the plaintiff was and is conclusively bound thereby. 3. That section 142 of the Constitution of North Dakota, if it applies to the present case, is void and inoperative because it is repugnant to and violates said Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. 4. That judgm…”
• State ex rel. McCue, Atty. Gen., v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co., 1909 ND 40 (1909, Fisk, J.)

• Southeast Cass Water Resource District v. Burlington Northern Railroad, 1995 ND 21 (1995, Meschke, J.)

The sidebar keeps a curated digest; this page is the complete record.