arti:sec1:sidebar
References
Cases - liberty and pursuit of happiness
- State ex rel. Goodsill v. Woodmansee, 1 N.D. 246, (N.D. 1890)
- State v. Fargo Bottling Works Co., 124 N.W. 387 (1910)
- Moody v. Hagen, 162 N.W. 704 (N.D. 1917)
- Cofman v. Ousterhous, 168 N.W. 826, 1918 N.D. LEXIS 91 (N.D. 1918)
- State ex rel. Germain v. Ross, 39 N.D. 630 (N.D. 1918)
- State ex rel. Bismarck v. District Court, 253 N.W. 744 (1934)
- State v. Cromwell, 9 N.W.2d 914 (N.D. 1943)
- Tayloe v. City of Wahpeton, 62 N.W.2d 31 (N.D. 1953)
- State v. Odegaard, 165 N.W.2d 677 (N.D. 1969)
- Rosen v. Bismarck, 181 N.W.2d 722 (N.D. 1970)
- Johnson v. Elkin, 263 N.W.2d 123, (N.D. 1978)
- State v. Goetz, 312 N.W.2d 1, (N.D. 1981)
Cases - bearing arms
- State v. Ricehill, 415 N.W.2d 481 (N.D. 1987)
- Keller v. Keller, 2017 ND 119
Cases - enjoying and defending life and liberty
- Wrigley v. Romanick, 2023 ND 50
Convention References
Prior Versions
References related to 1984 Amendment
- N.D. Shooting Sports Ass'n launches petition effort Bis. Trib. Jan. 15, 1984
- Arms petition gains signatures, Bis. Trib. Mar. 12, 1984
- N.D. gun measure petitions filed, number could be record Bis. Trib. Jul. 21, 1984
- Lloyd Omdahl, People to Vote on 4 Measures Minot Daily News, Oct. 8, 1984
- John Andrist, The Journal, Oct. 24, 1984
- Measure No. 3 – No Minot Daily News, Oct. 26, 1984
- Sample Ballot Minot Daily News, Oct. 27, 1984
- Farmers Union Supports Ballot Measures Minot Daily News, Oct. 29, 1984
- Measure 3 proponents don't expect any problems Bis. Trib. Nov. 4, 1984
- Yes on #3 Bis. Trib. Nov. 4, 1984
- And on bearing guns… Bis. Trib. Nov. 5, 1984
- Initiated Measure Approved (236,596 to 58,582) 1985 Session Laws ch. 702
Scholarly works
- Steven G. Calabresi & Sofía M. Vickery, On Liberty and the Fourteenth Amendment: The Original Understanding of the Lockean Natural Rights Guarantees, 93 Tex. L.Rev. 1299 (2015)
- Joseph R. Grodin, Rediscovering the State Constitutional Right to Happiness and Safety, 25 Hastings Const. L.Q. 1 (1997)
Parallel Provisions predating N.D. Const.
- U.S. Const. amend. II (“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”)
- N.J. Const. art. I, sec. 1. See State v. Post, 20 N.J.L. 368, 372 (1845)
- Cal. Const. art. I, sec. 1. See Ex parte Newman, 9 Cal. 502, 503 (1858)
- N.H. Const. art. II. See Orr v. Quimby, 54 N.H. 590, 627 (1874)
arti/sec1/sidebar.txt · Last modified: 2024/10/01 21:57 by admin